Now CityHomes
Courtyard blocks of homes around a planted street, seen from above. Concept rendering.

Now City Homes

Aggregate massive demand for high quality factory built multi-family buildings by driving cost below $200/sq ft with technology and design.

$95B a yearof homes California, Oregon and Washington say they need, at today's cost
$200 vs $350a square foot for a complete building: our target, 42% below today
$881M a yearin revenue at 10% of the I-5 and CA-99 market
Concept rendering

The West Coast is 238,000 homes a year short, because apartments cost too much to build.

  • A 6-story Portland building costs $350 a square foot to build, $243,211 a home before land and fees.[1] Seattle reached $410 to $428.[2]
  • San Francisco has 58,400 approved homes that nobody can afford to start.[3]
  • The three states target 391,000 homes a year and permitted 153,608 in 2025.[4][5][6][7]
  • Housing factories keep closing: Katerra in 2021, Veev in 2023, Factory_OS in 2026.[8][9][10]
  • Terner's interviews found unstable demand, not factory capacity, limits California's factories.[11]
  • Developers buy one building at a time, so nobody can plan a supply chain around them.

One system: aggregate the demand, then design everything else around it.

We design the whole chain together, from first principles, as one product: what gets built, how it is made, how it moves, how it goes up and how it is run.

AI in every step

Product development, design, engineering, code review, pricing, sales, logistics, construction scheduling and operations run on shared models and agents. One building's data improves the next.

Robots in the plant and on site

Robotic framing, panel and pod lines off site. Robotic layout, lifting and finishing on site. In one DOE-funded modular-home factory, automated steel framing cut construction time by up to 46% against wood framing.[12]

Autonomous electric delivery

Flat-pack parts move by rail and autonomous electric trucks along I-5, timed to the site's assembly schedule. California issued its first heavy autonomous truck testing permit, with a safety driver aboard, in August 2026.[13]

A kit of standard timber frame parts. Concept rendering.
One kit of parts for every building
Robots on a factory line building room modules. Concept rendering.
Robotic production
Autonomous shuttles on a street of new homes. Concept rendering.
Autonomous mobility for residents too

TAM $95B, SAM $15.4B, SOM $881M a year.

Every figure is priced on the Portland prototype home, 694 square feet of building, smaller than the average new home. Real values are higher.

$95B
TAM: 391,000 homes a yearwhat the three states say they need, all housing types, priced as apartments at $350 a square foot[5][6][7]
$15.4B
SAM: 63,000 homes a yearapartments and townhomes permitted in 22 metros on I-5 and CA-99, 2025[4][14][15]
$881M
SOM: 6,341 homes a year10% of SAM at $200 a square foot, our target from year 8

At $200, more of the TAM becomes buildable: Portland's study found 6-story projects pencil once hard costs fall 15 to 40%.[1] The SAM uses 2025, the low point of the cycle. The demand audit by state and metro is on the Market page.

From $350 to $200 a square foot: published evidence supports the first $50, and the system design has to deliver the other $100.

No one builds a complete West Coast mid-rise for $200 today. This is how the system gets there. The steps are our estimates.

Today, Portland 6-story[1]
$350
Factory production on one catalog[16]
−$50
Robots in the plant and on site
−$35
One contract, no stacked markups
−$35
Ten-year volume buying
−$20
Weeks on site: less site overhead
−$10
Complete building, delivered
$200

Factory production on standard designs cuts hard cost 10 to 25% and schedules 20 to 50% when orders are steady.[16] The plan takes 14%, below the middle of that range. The other $100 comes from robots, buying power, one contract instead of stacked markups, and less time on site. Our 12% margin sits inside the $200.

A supply network that grows with the orders, not a fixed set of factories.

Capacity is added where signed demand is, in steps a ten-year order book can finance. Partners own most of the plant. We own the design, the software, the orders and the assembly system.

Wall panels on a production line. Concept rendering.

Components

Steel, timber, windows and plumbing pods from mills and makers near ports, on ten-year volume.

Robotic arms in a production hall. Concept rendering.

Robotic assembly hubs

On rail lines, many on surplus, mall and office land, within a day's drive of demand.

Black and white photograph of electric railway track being laid through the Willamette Valley in the early 1900s.

Autonomous distribution

Flat-pack parts by rail and autonomous electric truck on corridors already built, like this valley line in the early 1900s.

Timber panels being assembled in a hall. Concept rendering.

Robotic site assembly

Foundations go in while parts are made. Buildings go up in weeks.

Panels ship at legal width on ordinary trucks and rail cars; whole modules need permits and escorts.[11] The plan's cost does not depend on autonomous trucks.

One frame, four kinds of home, made from the same parts.

A mid-rise block on a corner. Concept rendering.
The Block: 4 to 6 stories, one stair, windows on two sides
Row houses along a lane. Concept rendering.
Row houses with a second small home
A taller building at dusk. Concept rendering.
A taller building for transit stops
A compact home with a window wall. Concept rendering.
Small homes for students and people living alone

Washington allows six-story single-stair buildings; Oregon allows four where a city opts in.[17] California does not yet, so California buildings use today's two-stair code.

The Now City stack adds value beyond the building itself.

A riverfront district of new homes, seen from above. Concept rendering.
A district on underused land. Concept rendering.
  • Land. The largest gains in a district come from assembling and entitling underused land.[18] Rail corridors, surplus public land, malls and office parks become districts, not single lots.
  • Underwriting. Upside Explorer finds the combination of moves that makes each project pencil, with a source behind every number.[19]
  • Time. Beyond the site overhead in the cost bridge, months off the schedule mean less construction interest and earlier rent for the owner.
  • Operations. Now City will run the neighborhoods it builds. Energy, water and mobility are shared systems, and every building's data improves the catalog.

None of this is in the financials below.

$881.2M a year from year 8. Peak cash $45.7M.

We sell the complete building at $200 a square foot, $138K for a prototype home, and keep 12% after every supplier, carrier and crew. Buyers save $104K a home.

35,073homes over ten years
$62.5Moperating profit a year at full scale
$45.7Mpeak cash; break-even in year 7
$3.6Bsaved by buyers over ten years
Plan $200. Today $350.
Plan 12%; low 8%, high 15%.
Plan 10%; low 5%, high 15%.
Counted from year 3. Plan 6; low 8.
Plan $8M a year, plus $4M a year of platform development in years 1 to 3.
RevenueOperating profit

CaseHomes, 10 yearsRevenue, year 10Peak cashBreak-even
Low: 8% margin, 5% share, 8 years to scale14,465$440.5M$77.8MNone in 10 years
Plan35,073$881.2M$45.7MYear 7
High: 15% margin, 15% share52,515$1.3B$36.3MYear 6

Peak cash includes $8K of our own robotic equipment per home of added yearly volume, working capital of 10% of revenue growth, and 4% of revenue for sales, delivery coordination, warranty and software. Partners fund most plant capacity on our order book. Every driver is our assumption.

Sign the demand first: ten-year commitments that finance the network.

Ritchie leads sales. Letters of intent come first, then framework agreements with deposits. A non-binding order book did not save Ilke Homes.[20]

Old industrial halls converted around new homes, seen from above. Concept rendering.
Underused land on a rail line
A street of new mid-rise homes with an arched gateway. Concept rendering.
Many buildings on one site
Homes along a planted street at dusk. Concept rendering.
Neighborhoods Now City will run
Source of ordersScale
Our own first districtPacific Northwest masterplan; first homes 2029
City and state surplus land5,100+ homes underway on California's excess state land[21]
Transit agency land on rail corridorsAbout 240,000 homes of capacity in California[22]
Distressed malls and office parksSix West Coast mall plans total about 15,400 homes[23]; office vacancy 26 to 28%[24]
Approved projects that stalled58,400 homes in San Francisco alone[3]
Universities9,000 shovel-ready UC beds without funding[25]
Mapped on-market sitesPartnerships in discussion to map every site that fits

New laws open the land: California SB 79 allows up to 75 feet near heavy-rail stations, and Washington HB 1491 sets about six stories near rail.[26][27] California AB 2185 lets state housing money fund factory deposits.[28]

US housing factories failed on uneven orders. Sweden's catalog, bought on multi-year frameworks, built about 10,000 apartments.

WhoModelOutcome
KaterraDesign, factories and contracting at onceBankrupt 2021[8]
VeevSteel-panel modulesShut down 2023[9]
Factory_OSModules, CaliforniaClosed 2026[10]
Kombohus, SwedenPublic buyers order from one catalogAbout 9,500 to 11,000 apartments[29]

The difference: we sign demand before capacity, partners carry most plant cost, and we design the whole chain instead of one factory.

Two co-founders with roughly equal stakes, two senior advisors, and a first team for engineering, robotics and sales.

Erik Gillberg, CEO

Product, go-to-market and marketing. 30 years in property operations, 20 in technology and startups.

Ritchie Ju, COO

Sales and accounts. Architecture and urban design, Carnegie Mellon and Columbia.

Neal Payton and Michael H. Shuman, advisors

Urban design at Torti Gallas; local economies and capital.

First hires

Supply chain, structural and code engineering, robotics and automation, AI, and two account executives.

$7.2M for year 1, $45.7M to break-even, and letters of intent.

Investors

Year 1 builds the catalog, the AI and robotics platform, and the order book. The pilot follows in year 2.

Buyers

A letter of intent naming sites, homes and years, priced at $200 a square foot.

Supply partners

Capacity reserved on our order book at an indexed price.

Year 1 (2027)Catalog for three states' codes; landed supplier prices in writing; letters of intent
Year 2 (2028)200 pilot homes at a measured cost; first framework agreements with deposits
Years 3 to 7Network grows with orders: 1,056 homes in year 3, 5,284 in year 7
Year 8 on6,341 homes a year

Risks, assumptions and sources.

Risks
  • $200 is unproven. The pilot measures it. If a complete building costs more, the plan resizes before the network grows.
  • Robotics and AI savings are early. The figures published so far are mostly from the companies selling them.
  • Imported steel. Section 232 tariffs of 25% or 50% apply to full customs value.[30] A customs ruling comes before any price.
  • Frame material. nowcity.co shows mass timber. Year 1 prices timber and steel systems.
  • Letters of intent do not bind. Deposits are the test.
Assumptions
Building area per home694 sq ft: Portland prototype, $243,211 / $350[1]
Price, margin, market share$200/sf, 12%, 10% of SAM
Ramp200 homes in year 2, equal steps to full scale in year 8
Costs$8M fixed a year; $4M a year platform development in years 1 to 3; 4% of revenue; $8K equipment per home of added volume; 10% working capital
Sources
  1. BAE Urban Economics for the City of Portland, Inclusionary Housing Calibration Findings, July 2023. https://www.sightline.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Portland-Inclusionary-Housing-Revised-Calibration-Findings-7-7-2023-1.pdf
  2. BERK Consulting and Heartland for the City of Seattle, Mandatory Housing Affordability Five Year Evaluation, March 2025. https://seattle.gov/documents/Departments/OPCD/SeattlePlan/MHA5YearEvaluationBERK2025.pdf
  3. San Francisco Planning, Housing Production Development Pipeline, 2026 Q2. https://sfplanning.org/sites/default/files/documents/reports/Housing_Production_Development_Pipeline-2026Q2.pdf
  4. US Census Bureau, Building Permits Survey, state annual files 2019 to 2025 and January to September 2026. https://www.census.gov/construction/bps/
  5. California HCD, Statewide Housing Plan (2022): about 2.5 million homes over the sixth housing cycle, as reported by CalMatters, August 2026. https://calmatters.org/housing/2026/08/california-rhna-housing-affordable-progress/
  6. Washington Department of Commerce, "Washington state will need more than 1 million homes in next 20 years", March 2023. https://www.commerce.wa.gov/washington-state-will-need-more-than-1-million-homes-in-next-20-years/
  7. Oregon Office of Economic Analysis, Oregon Housing Needs Analysis 2026 production targets, December 2025. https://www.oregon.gov/das/oea/Documents/OHNA-2026-Results-Report.pdf
  8. ProBuilder, 2021, on Katerra's bankruptcy and the sale of its Tracy plant. https://probuilder.com/modular-builder-vbc-verge-25-million-buy-katerra-assets
  9. TechCrunch, "Prefab home builder Veev reportedly shutting down", November 2023. https://techcrunch.com/2023/11/27/prefab-home-builder-veev-reportedly-shutting-down-after-reaching-unicorn-status-last-year
  10. Vallejo Sun, February 2026, and Offsite Innovators, "Farewell to Harbinger", September 2026, on the closure of Factory_OS (renamed Harbinger). https://offsiteinnovators.com/farewell-to-harbinger-a-factory-that-proved-modular-could-build-at-scale/
  11. Terner Center for Housing Innovation, "Potential Pathways to Scale Innovative Construction Methods in California", March 2026. https://ternercenter.berkeley.edu/research-and-policy/potential-pathways-to-scale-innovative-construction-methods-in-california/
  12. US Department of Energy, "Transformative Efficiency and Automation in Modular Homes" (GTI Energy with Dvele, Loma Linda, California), updated March 2025. https://www.energy.gov/eere/buildings/transformative-efficiency-and-automation-modular-homes-teamh
  13. Automotive World, "California grants Kodiak AI autonomous trucking permit", August 2026. https://www.automotiveworld.com/news/california-grants-kodiak-ai-autonomous-trucking-permit/
  14. US Census Bureau, Building Permits Survey, metro (CBSA) annual files 2024 and 2025. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/CBSA%20(beginning%20Jan%202024)/
  15. US Census Bureau, Survey of Construction microdata 2019 to 2025 (our tabulation of attached homes, Pacific division). https://www.census.gov/construction/chars/microdata.html
  16. Terner Center, testimony to the California Assembly Select Committee on Housing Construction Innovation, January 6, 2026. https://ternercenter.berkeley.edu/blog/testimony-to-the-select-committee-on-housing-construction-innovation/
  17. Washington RCW 19.27.115 and WSR 25-23-081; Oregon Building Codes Division, 2025 OSSC Appendix Q (single-exit stair). https://www.oregon.gov/bcd/codes-stand/Documents/25ossc-single-exit-stair-appq.pdf
  18. Now City, "How Districts Create Value", Salem River District field notes, 2026. https://nowcity.co/salem/district-value
  19. Now City, Upside Explorer. https://nowcity.ai/upside-explorer
  20. Construction Enquirer, "Offsite specialist Ilke Homes falls into administration", June 2023. https://www.constructionenquirer.com/2023/06/30/offsite-specialist-ilke-homes-falls-into-administration/
  21. California Department of General Services, "California Closes 2025 with Affordable Housing Wins", December 2025 (excess state land program). https://www.dgs.ca.gov/Press-Releases/Page-Content/News-List-Folder/California-Closes-2025-with-Affordable-Housing-Wins
  22. Enterprise Community Partners, "Assessing the Potential of Transit Agency-Owned Land for Housing Development in California", March 2026. https://enterprisecommunity.org/sites/default/files/2026-03/Enterprise-Transit-Agency-Land-Use-Report.pdf
  23. Mall redevelopment plans: Stonestown (CBS News SF, July 2024), The Rise at Vallco (SV@Home, February 2026), Westminster (CoStar), Lloyd Center (Axios Portland, February 2026), Northgate (The Urbanist, 2024), Tanforan (CEQAnet SCH 2023120409). https://cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/sf-stonestown-galleria-3500-new-homes-final-approval-board-of-supervisors
  24. Office vacancy, Q3 2026: CBRE San Francisco, CBRE Portland, Kidder Mathews Seattle and San Diego, TenantBase Los Angeles. https://www.cbre.com/insights/figures/san-francisco-office-figures-q3-2026
  25. University of California, Student Housing Projects 2026 fact sheet. https://housingbond.universityofcalifornia.edu/_files/uc-student-housing-projects-2026-r6-acc.pdf
  26. California HCD, "SB 79 Transit-Oriented Development", updated August 2026. https://www.hcd.ca.gov/planning-and-research/sb79-tod
  27. Futurewise, "HB 1491 FAQ" (Washington transit-oriented development, 2025). https://futurewise.org/tod1491/
  28. Novogradac, California AB 2185 enacted, September 2026. https://www.novoco.com/public-media/documents/california-ab-2185-enacted-09292026.pdf
  29. Sveriges Allmännytta, "Public housing: Sweden's Kombohus"; Unihouse on the 2020 six-year framework. https://sverigesallmannytta.se/in-english/public-housing-swedens-kombohus
  30. Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum (tracker through August 2026); Arent Fox Schiff, April 2026. https://www.strtrade.com/trade-news-resources/tariff-actions-resources/section-232-tariffs-on-steel-aluminum